Stages theory of entrepreneurship

The entrepreneurial process is often conceptualized as stage-based. In ecology and biology, there are stages of development or decay present in many phenomena. The description, explanation and prediction of cycles is one of the mainstays of the hard sciences.

Kazanjian and Drazin (1990) suggest four stages to explain the how an entrepreneurial opportunity becomes a business. They propose that the drivers and resisters of entrepreneurship are different at each stage of venture development. Probably only the first stage or two is really about entrepreneurship, whereas growth and stability are really managerial issues after a certain point. 
  1. conception and development
  2. commercialization 
  3. growth
  4. stability
Bhave (1994) put forward four stages. In this case, the transitions where ordered but one can easily imagine cases where these stages overlap temporally or are happening simultaneously. While the stages proposed by each theory do not perfectly line up, there is a pattern between them. However, the length of each stage and the emphasis on indicators of stage transition differ. Perhaps there are stages, but these would be too context-specific to replicate.  
  • opportunity
  • technology set-up  
  • organization-creation
  • exchange stage 
The pattern in academia seems to be to define the stages and check that they are really there, especially across contexts. There are many stage based models out there and new ones are continually popping up. A critic might wonder if a four stage theory is a great way to kill an hour long paid keynote--it's a story with a nice progression, after all.
Sources:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Marshall McLuhan's theory of entrepreneurship

Impulsive theory of entrepreneurship

Cultural theory of entrepreneurship